Andrew Buchanan
Andrew is the managing partner in BWO’s St. Louis office. Andrew (along with the other attorneys and staff at BWO) focuses on personal service for his clients. Clients have Andrew’s personal cell phone and can call him anytime with questions or concerns.
Andrew started his law career with Lewis Rice & Fingersh, LC, which is one of the largest law firms in the St. Louis area. Andrew is married to Kimberly Ulrich Buchanan. Kim is an attorney and partner in the law firm Wegner Buchanan. Andrew and Kim live in St. Louis with their two children.
Learn more about our team of accomplished attorneys including Charles Buchanan, Walter Williams, James V. O’Brien, Nicole Carlton, and Emily Taylor.
Education: Andrew is 2002 graduate of Saint Louis University School of Law. He graduated magna sum laude in the top 5% of the law school class. He received his undergraduate degree in finance and banking in 1999 from the University of Missouri-Columbia, where he graduated summa cum laude.
Bar & Admissions:Missouri, Illinois, Eastern District of Missouri, Western District of Missouri, Southern District of Illinois
Memberships
Representative Cases
Sage v. Talbot Industries, 427 S.W.3d 906 (Mo. App. S.D. 2014) (workers’ compensation matter granting favorable result for Andrew’s client, an injured worker)
Gannon Intern., Ltd. v. Blocker, 684 F.3d 785 (8th Cir. 2012) (business dispute where summary judgment affirmed in favor of Andrew’s client)
Franke v. Greene, 2012 WL 3156577 (E.D. Mo. 2012) (business dispute where summary judgment denied in favor of Andrew’s client)
Drew County, Ark. v. Joh Pas Murray Co., 2011 WL 1533434 (E.D. Ark. 2011) (construction dispute involving Arkansas hospital where motion for summary judgment denied in favor of Andrew’s client)
Smith v. Laboratory Corp. of America, Inc., 2010 WL 5464770 (W.D. Wash. 2010) (medical malpractice claim resolved successfully for Andrew’s client)
Thirty and 141, L.P. v. Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 565 F.3d 443 (8th Cir. 2009) (commercial landlord-tenant dispute where summary judgment in favor of Andrew’s client reversed)
Tate v. Laboratory Corp. of American Holdings, 285 S.W.3d 261 (Ark. App. 2008) (negligence claim against laboratory where motion for summary judgment affirmed in favor of Andrew’s client).
U.S. ex rel. Joshi v. St. Luke’s Hosp., Inc., 441 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006) (fraudulent billing claim against hospital where dismissal affirmed in favor of Andrew’s client)
Harris v. The Epoch Group, L.C., 357 F.3d 822 (8th Cir. 2004) (claim against health insurance plan for benefits where summary judgment in favor of Andrew’s client was reversed)